|
THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO.
Term Paper ID:30215
|
|
|
Essay Subject:
Examines predictions Karl Marx & Friederich Engels made in the 1848 document.... More...
|
6 Pages / 1350 Words
5 sources, 11 Citations,
APA Format
$24.00
Return to List of Papers
|
Paper Abstract: Examines predictions Karl Marx & Friederich Engels made in the 1848 document. How the class struggle would unfold in future decades. Contends that by 1890, most of the Manifesto's predictions did not occur such as ending the misery of the working classes. The one prediction that came true was the periodic occurrence of economic disruptions (overproduction).
Paper Introduction: THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO:
HOW ACCURATE WERE ITS PREDICTIONS BY 1890?
The “Manifesto of the Communist Party” by Karl Marx and Friederich Engels has proved to be an enduring and widely read call to arms for revolutionary movements around the world. However, few of its predictions came true – or even seemed to be coming true, especially in the first forty-two years after its original publication in 1848.
The document outlined a scenario for how the world, in general, and the “class struggle,” in particular, would unfold over the coming decades. In general, the manifesto clearly and accurately noted the periodic occurrence of economic disruptions that Marx and Engels called epidemics of overproduction. They observed them happening about once every ten years, and assumed they were an inevitab
Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.
Indeed, that very year of 1848 saw uprisings across Europethat raised great hopes in communist and other left-wing circles. Initially, their idea was that education in a socialized or group setting,run by the proletarian state, would be a corollary to their familyabolition program. By then, other goals, however dubious,would have been attained. Indeed, in his inaugural address for the Working Men's InternationalAssociation, or "First International," in London in 1864, Marx himselfwrote that despite (or perhaps because of) the enormous growth of commerceand industry, "It is a great fact that the misery of the working masses hasnot diminished from 1848 to 1864" (Marx, 1978, p. However, by the late nineteenth century, most states inthe U.S. Fora precious moment, they must surely have believed that everything they'dwritten was coming true right then and there. 34). Ed. Marx and Engels also called for and forecast the abolition of thefamily - perhaps their most radical idea of all. One can easilyimagine, and forgive, their feelings of overconfidence at that remarkabletime. In particular, perhaps the manifesto's most inaccurate call of all wasthe notion that individual nations would disappear before the powerfuldrive for dignity and equality by international workers. The document outlined a scenario for how the world, in general, andthe "class struggle," in particular, would unfold over the coming decades.In general, the manifesto clearly and accurately noted the periodicoccurrence of economic disruptions that Marx and Engels called epidemics ofoverproduction. Tucker. Reference Ascherson, N. Robert C. Marx, K. Likewise, the manifesto demanded the abolition of private property,and suggested it would actually happen in the near future. On the other hand, he seems to have ignored altogether aseries of reform bills in England - in 1832, 1867 and 1884 - that extendedvoting rights to progressively larger portions of the population.) In the manifesto, Marx and Engels suggested that a soon-to-comebourgeois revolution would be followed almost at once by a proletarianrevolution. (1978). Little of what they'd suggested intheir elegantly-written work had come to pass. It was only in thetwentieth century that their little opus would gain a following in thetens, or hundreds, of millions. Even so, by 189 their proposal hadgarnered little or no interest and showed no signs of coming true. Robert C. And with what immediately followed, they must have felt like gods -as if their words were transmuting themselves into thrilling reality. 26). 1998) "All That Is Solid Melts into Air." NewStatesman. 488). In addition, in 189 , neither the graduated income tax on a heavyscale, nor abolition of all rights of inheritance - two more ideas in themanifesto -- were being seriously considered. "15 Years Later: Marx Manifesto Revisited." The NewLeader v.81.11, p. However, by189 private property, especially in the areas of transportation and heavyindustry, had tightened its influence over most governments of the Westernworld and held great sway over many aspects of the lives of individualcitizens (Harding, 1998, p. "Inaugural Address of the Working Men'sInternational Association." The Marx-Engels Reader. Perhaps the manifesto's most accurate forecast up to 189 was the callfor and prediction of "social," or universal, education - though certainlyat that point it was not working out quite as Marx and Engels had intended. Marx, K., & Engels, F. Tyler, G. Certainly, in theolder European societies, with no land left to give out and most of whatthere was owned in vast tracts by obscenely wealthy landlords, and with theindustrial revolution and all its oppressive side effects already wellunderway, the expectations of riots and insurrections on some level musthave been palpable - aromatic, even - as the two men carried out theirmandate to write a new battle cry for the industrial age. On thecontrary, though realizing their goal would remain years away, suffragemovements were well entrenched by then and working hard to get equal rightsfor women, including the right to vote (Ascherson, 1978, p. 26), it was an understandable mistake. Indeed, even by then themanifesto's followers were confined to a dedicated few. 24). They observed them happening about once every ten years,and assumed they were an inevitable byproduct of the so-called "bourgeoisepoch," or capitalist system, that would continue indefinitely and keepgetting worse (Tyler, 1998, p. p. and many European countries had finally and firmly establishedcompulsory education for all - though it's no doubt safe to say that noneof the children was being raised by anyone except their own individualfamilies. 512). Though later on, governments wouldbelatedly take corrective measures, by 189 - after a series of devastatingeconomic depressions or "panics" in both Europe and the United States, thiswas one idea that seemed entirely plausible. Indeed, the two menscoffed at the many critics of this notion, declaring, The ... (In the samespeech, however, Marx heaped praise on England's new "Ten Hour Bill" thatplaced the first-ever restrictions on how long men could be kept working ona single shift. Similar uprisings spread to Vienna, Berlin, theRhineland, Venice, other regions of Italy, and areas controlled by Austriaand Hungary. 11-14. "Manifesto of the Communist Party."The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton, p. 488).However, nationalism proved to be arguably the strongest "ism" of thenineteenth century. "Nationaldifferences and antagonisms between peoples are daily more and morevanishing," Marx and Engels wrote in the manifesto (Marx, 1978, p. The manifesto's other corollary to family abolition was a call for a"community of women," who would apparently give birth to babies by avariety of fathers and then give them over to the state. Whatever merits their claim might have had, by 189 there were nosigns whatever that more than a fanatical handful had any interest inpromoting or taking part in such a plan. For the manifesto's "real strength was not inprophecy" but in developing "an entirely original approach to humansociety" entailing a "new science of revolution" based on the classstruggle (Ascherson, 1998, p. 12). middle classes to fight and die for the emancipation" (Ascherson,1998, p. 473-5 . Indeed, both men must havefelt fairly giddy with the excitement of the times. (27 Feb. (1998). 13-44. Harding, N. 24-26. Most were crushed or had short-lived successes, though theParis revolt forced the overthrow of King Louis Philippe and establishedthe Second French Republic. Nor was the notion that thestate would either take over or expand its control over credit,communications, transportation and factories. The "Manifesto of the Communist Party" by Karl Marx and FriederichEngels has proved to be an enduring and widely read call to arms forrevolutionary movements around the world. Marx and Engelsargued that this would bring out into the open and legalize "thehypocritically concealed" bourgeois system of "seducing each other's wives... Tucker.New York: Norton, p. Indeed, it could be argued that in 189 private enterprise was at its unfettered peak - though troubles in the formof unionization and general discontent were flaring up and looming ever-larger on the horizon. clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting ... Instead, there were years of struggleahead with little to show for it - at least by the time of Marx's death in1883 and Engels' demise soon after. Indeed, forty-two years after the manifesto'spublication, the "spectre" described by Marx and Engels as "hauntingEurope" seemed like one more idea that might come true, after all. However, few of its predictionscame true - or even seemed to be coming true, especially in the first forty-two years after its original publication in 1848. by the action of Modern Industry, [under which] all family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children are transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour (Marx, 1978, p. [and] prostitution" (Marx 488). Thefirst revolt came in Paris, even as the manifesto was, literally, cominghot off the presses. Ed. 512-19. Indeed, the unification after lengthy struggles ofItaly in 1864 and Germany in 1871 turned out to be two defining momentsthat would reshape the world as much or more than communism over thecentury that followed the manifesto's first appearance (Harding, 1998, p.29). Thus, though "the manifesto fatally overestimated the determination ofthe ... (1998) "Marx, Engels and the Manifesto: Working Class,Party, and Proletariat." Journal of Political Ideologiesv.3.1, p. (1978). Likewise, there was noserious thought being given to the "establishment of industrial armies,""the combination of agriculture with manufacturing" or the "gradualabolition of the distinction between town and country" (Marx, 1998, p.49 ). It was not to be, of course. THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO: HOW ACCURATE WERE ITS PREDICTIONS BY 189 ?
If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:
or
Click here to request an essay written just for you.
|
|
|