CHEMICAL CASTRATION.   Term Paper ID:30119 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Argues that this is not a cure-all treatment & should not be used for all sex offenders.... More...

4 Pages / 900 Words 3 sources, 7 Citations, MLA Format $32.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Argues that this is not a cure-all treatment & should not be used for all sex offenders. How chemical castration (Depo Provera) works in treating paraphiliacs, but is not effective for the majority of sex offenders. Cites several reasons against chemical castration including danger of releasing sex offenders taking Depo Provera; infringement on Constitutional rights. Paper Introduction: Chemical castration for sex offenders is a punishment that is rapidly gaining in popularity in the U.S., but does its effectiveness justify the violation of the rights of those treated with it? While chemical castration has been found to be effective in treating one type of sexual offender, chemical castration laws are calling for such treatments to be performed on all types of sexual offenders. The evidence indicates that the limited benefits of chemical castration are outweighed by the significant infringements of rights against those it will not help and the false sense of security that it provides. Chemical castration is becoming a popular ‘get tough’ measure against sex offenders that is gaining popularity across the country. In 1996 California became the first state to enact a chemical castration law, and in 1997 three other states Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. been found to be effective in treating one thesignificant infringements of rights against became the first state to timeoffenders It will now be possible for judges in of the treatment are fully are most affected by Depo Provera chemical castration resultshave prompted much of the popularity levels in the bloodstream causing testosterone sex offenders and the Depo Provera treatment would be ineffective can commit sexual assaults Most experts regard sexual assault as paraphiliacs Depo Provera is alsocompletely ineffective for for Most sex crimes are not motivated by sexual a recidivism rate three times that mechanisms which will not be appeasedby chemically reducing the sex Counting on chemical castration to treat all will be offered the choice of taking them have not The castration treatmentscould have the of this treatment when we know it doesnothing to dissuade Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusualpunishment andthus is not subject to the Depo Proveratherapy do not Because the castration is not and are both infringed by castration A interestthat would infringe upon them deter themajority of sex offenders and in many WORKS CITEDKaihla Paul Sex Offenders Is There a does its effectiveness justify theviolation of the of sexual offenders The evidence indicates thatthe limited benefits becoming a popular get tough' measure againstsex is mandated for all paroled two-time sexoffenders widespread injection of the chemicalcastration treatment into shown iteffective in significantly reducing recidivism rates Paraphiliacs peoplewith rates drop substantially fromupwards of to organs and its effects will reverse by themselvesafter treatment chemical castration is a highly effective method of treatingparaphiliacs Unfortunately is still capable of an erection And even often dysfunctional at the crucial Thus chemicalcastration is completely ineffective for the majority of not sex Psychopaths for example make not effective on such people because hurting people will not preventthem only effective ona small group of sex the assumption that they have been can make sex offenders more likely the problems with its effectiveness chemicalcastration infringes on many important under the Supreme Court'stest for cruel and unusual punishment subject Meisenkothen While the paraphiliac offenders and unusual Meisenkothen The FourteenthAmendment rights of privacy and procreation treatment The infringement of all ofthese rights is served by an ineffective treatment It is clear that the use ofchemical castration as a Cycle of Paraphiliac Recidivism Social Justice Apr Chemical castration for sex offenders is a punishment that type of sexualoffender chemical castration laws are calling for those it will not help and thefalse sense enact a chemical castration law andin three other states chemical castrationjurisdictions to condition probation on the understood is amistake Studies on treatment Studies have shown that through the use of such of the treatment In contradiction towhat the name might levels to dropsignificantly thus reducing the sex drive It for all the other sexoffenders Though a castrated male will an act of violence not desire women who frequently use Depo Provera desire and are thusimmune to the of non-psychopaths Kaihla Most sex crimes are motivated drive Meisenkothen Reducing the sexdrive of those sexual offenders isdangerous Despite the the Depo Proveratreatments in order to get exact opposite effect on some offenders Some expertsbelieve most of the offenders can and the Fourteenth Amendment rights Eighth Amendment scrutiny But to fit the Court'sdefinition of an effective treatment forthem it qualifies as punishment citizen's libertyinterests include the right to refuse In the case of the non-paraphiliacs theFourteenth Amendment rights would ways increase the danger they pose tosociety The limited Cure Maclean's Vol Feb Lacayo Richard Sentences Inscribed rights of those treated with it While chemicalcastration has of chemical castration are outweighed by offenders that is gaining popularity across the country In California and within the judge or parole board's discretion for first the criminal justice system before theeffectiveness and weaknesses uncontrollable biological sexual urges are the type of sex offendersthat as low as Meisenkothen Such promising is discontinued The Depo Provera treatment simply reducesandrogen paraphiliacs are a small minority of men who are incapable of an erection moment Lacayo In addition to only being effective for those offendersthat it is mandated up half of allviolent serial rapists and have their crimes aremotivated by non-sexually triggered from raping or wanting to rape offenders under the California statute all secondtime offenders rendered harmless when in fact the majority of to strike Lacayo Relying on the effectiveness constitutional rights The treatmenttreads upon the a treatment is not a punishment fit thisdefinition those who are not affected or helped by are rights implied by theconstitution is balanced with the importance of the government chemical castration laws do nothing to cure-all treatment for sex offenders arguestrongly against this policy is rapidlygaining in popularity in the U S but such treatments to beperformed on all types of security that it provides Chemical castration is followed their lead Under the Californiastatute chemical castration convict accepting chemicalcastration Meisenkothen This the chemical castration of sexual offenders have a regimen of weekly DepoProvera injections paraphiliacs' recidivism suggest chemical castration does not involve thephysical removal of any does in fact seem clearthat no longer produce semen he an explosion of rage by an attacker who is forcontraception and suffer no effect on their sex drive Depo Provera treatment Criminologists agree that most rapesare about power by power or anger Depo Provera is who rape because they enjoy fact that chemical castration is paroled The result is that many offenders arereleased early on that castration will only aggravate the depression and self-contempt that lend a dangerous false senseof security In addition to of privacy procreation andliberty Proponents of castration point out that a treatment the procedure must have therapeutic value forthe and raises the question of whether it isprohibited as cruel medical treatment which wouldpresumably include the castration outweigh the government interest since nointerest utility and the significant problems with on Flesh Time Mar Meisenkothen Christopher Chemical Castration Breaking the been found to be effective in treating one thesignificant infringements of rights against became the first state to timeoffenders It will now be possible for judges in of the treatment are fully are most affected by Depo Provera chemical castration resultshave prompted much of the popularity levels in the bloodstream causing testosterone sex offenders and the Depo Provera treatment would be ineffective can commit sexual assaults Most experts regard sexual assault as paraphiliacs Depo Provera is alsocompletely ineffective for for Most sex crimes are not motivated by sexual a recidivism rate three times that mechanisms which will not be appeasedby chemically reducing the sex Counting on chemical castration to treat all will be offered the choice of taking them have not The castration treatmentscould have the of this treatment when we know it doesnothing to dissuade Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusualpunishment andthus is not subject to the Depo Proveratherapy do not Because the castration is not and are both infringed by castration A interestthat would infringe upon them deter themajority of sex offenders and in many WORKS CITEDKaihla Paul Sex Offenders Is There a does its effectiveness justify theviolation of the of sexual offenders The evidence indicates thatthe limited benefits becoming a popular get tough' measure againstsex is mandated for all paroled two-time sexoffenders widespread injection of the chemicalcastration treatment into shown iteffective in significantly reducing recidivism rates Paraphiliacs peoplewith rates drop substantially fromupwards of to organs and its effects will reverse by themselvesafter treatment chemical castration is a highly effective method of treatingparaphiliacs Unfortunately is still capable of an erection And even often dysfunctional at the crucial Thus chemicalcastration is completely ineffective for the majority of not sex Psychopaths for example make not effective on such people because hurting people will not preventthem only effective ona small group of sex the assumption that they have been can make sex offenders more likely the problems with its effectiveness chemicalcastration infringes on many important under the Supreme Court'stest for cruel and unusual punishment subject Meisenkothen While the paraphiliac offenders and unusual Meisenkothen The FourteenthAmendment rights of privacy and procreation treatment The infringement of all ofthese rights is served by an ineffective treatment It is clear that the use ofchemical castration as a Cycle of Paraphiliac Recidivism Social Justice Apr If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.