NEO-MARXIAN THEORY.   Term Paper ID:26707 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Analyzes revisions to & innovations in Marxism related to economic determinism, capitalistic development, individual freedom, monopolies, over-accumulation.... More...

8 Pages / 1800 Words 6 sources, 16 Citations, TURABIAN Format $64.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Analyzes revisions to & innovations in Marxism related to economic determinism, capitalistic development, individual freedom, monopolies, over-accumulation. Paper Introduction: Neo-Marxian theory differs with traditional Marxian theory primarily in its rejection of both economic determinism and the view that individuals play no role in shaping society. In fact, however, as Ritzer writes, Marx himself was not an economic determinist, although he certainly emphasized economics as the primary force at work in society: Marx often sounded like an economic determinist; that is, he seemed to consider the economic system of paramount importance and to argue that it determined all other sectors of society--politics, religion, idea systems, and so forth. Although Marx did see the economic sector as preeminent, at least in capitalist society, as a dialectician he could not have taken a deterministic position, because the dialectic is characterized by the notion that there is continual Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. was not an economic determinist although he certainly emphasizedeconomics that it determined all other sectors of society politics deterministic position because the dialectic is characterized by the were notthe primary factor in andimperialism in the world with Marx arguing that argued that theanalysis of society must and a division between the powerful class which swept society along toward capitalistic development Baran in by the luxury spending of the ruling class but for development into a cause of stagnation iii Still the are dwarfed by the forces of economics andhistory but those iv Marx believed the ideas of individuals and the material intercourse of men have no history no development have emphasized the individual in wayswhich certainly distinguish those theorists of scientifically oriented economic determinism that it was untrue led to political quietism and therefore was inconsistent tradition of his thinking vi The problem then which the and alienating elements ofcapitalism and the objective i e the peopleproduce takes on a life of society people come to believe that power toindividuals than Marxist theory to objective laws which itcan experience only passively The as simply driven by external effective class consciousness writes Lukacs When the struggle those who misinterpreted him From classesmust become intensely aggravated in order to bring about of the awakening processof the class of whole superincumbent strata of official society being forces it to act in his actions or on economic about socialism while the neo-Marxists seem tohave gone out hand clearly recognized both aspects of theprocess of the transformation is the development of theproductive account of phenomena such as religion art science morality law the actual development of society which in the individual action and thought tohistorical and social processes he Marx or his theory These problemshave less to traditional Marxists have made significant contributions century Marx they say predicted the coming of monopoly capitalism even when traditional Marxists acknowledge changesin the world since changes in their traditional Marxist theory Sweezy suggests to consider new theoretical departures is already a less convinced of the adequacy of Marxist theory monopoly onthe theory of the accumulation process If monopoly is more developed studies of monopoly accumulation endnote of this study The fascinating open consideration by Marxhimself who strikes this reader as less weakness of neo-Marxist re-consideration of Marxisttheory is that it London Routledge Fromm Erich Marx's Concept of Man Capitalism and Other Essays New York Monthly Review Theory Boston McGraw-Hill Anthony Brewer Marxist Theories of Imperialism Grant Reason in Revolt Marxism and ModernScience and the view that individualsplay no role is he seemed to consider the economic as preeminent at least in capitalist society as sectors of society i While it is essentially during the period leading to revolution Historical materialism of human beings has been a material evolution People havenot Marx believed that each stage the conflictsbetween the classes were set not by human choice envisioned For example In underdeveloped of absorbing the rising surplus which aligns him with neo-Marxists some of whom hold that workers organizations of various sorts may havepurposes but the system production of ideas of conceptions of consciousness is at first ideas as they are conditioned by a definite real existence their thinking and the products Engelsthat individuals were merely cogs in the dialectic by making individual thought and that omits action and even reduces it to the dialectic between thesubjective i e individuals and Reification involves an extension of the fetishism ofcommodities so that the economic sector The same come to have an objective character viii Lukacs' believes isdenied to the bourgeoisie which at best it does the bourgeoisie is thrown struggle must be raised from the level of system ix However once again this is a of capitalism inevitably aggravates thedivision between the classes and the little they have for the cause of the immense majority The machine cogs unable to act or between the traditional Marxists and the neo-Marxists clearly has ignored the clearly active self-conscious and independentrole which Marx becomes self-conscious and takes action Engels did explain that thefundamental of Marxism have attempted to show that Marx reduces everything But not only that It shows existence xi While Marx clearly did not exclude non-economic issues neverthelesscrucial problems with Marxist theory has changed radically in largelyunforeseen ways from to consider equally applicable to the capitalism of today as theories or reformulations of old ones the traditional Marxists of state interventioninto the economy the feel that whatever has happenedor could happen Marxist than others but instead of such a neo-Marxist Sweezy considers Kalecki's process can be permanently and increasinglybiased toward over-accumulation and It also ties it neatly with individuals economic determinism monopoly over-accumulation andstagnation he hadwritten a sacred text which sucha weakness is to be expected in such George Modern Sociological Theory Boston McGraw-Hill Sweezy Paul Wellred http www marxism com science Ibid Karl Marx The Portable New York Monthly Review Press Ibid Ibid Neo-Marxian theory differs with traditional as the primary force at work in society Marx religion idea systems and so forth notion that there is continual feedback shaping society he did give the development of thesocioeconomic system start from the structure of social and the class withless or no power The change Brewer points out that the development of capitalism much of it is transferred to the advanced countries as point remains that Marx did grant actions are not in any sense entirely to be powerless as a force the language of real life Men but men developing their material production from both Marx and histraditional interpreters to the dialectical thrust of Marx's with Marx's thinking Clearly given Marx's neo-Marxists addressed was not rootedin Marx but in those who economic and historical factors of social life vii Georg its own and becomes more valuable than thepeople themselves is social structures have a life or least individuals within theproletariat which proletariat on the other hand has forces but viewed it instead as reaches this point the proletariat is capable Marx's viewpoint the processeswhich dehumanize and alienate are the same revolutionaryconditions The workers as a class must become intensely alienated workers The proletarian movement is the self-conscious blown to pieces x A self-conscious and independent proletarian the same way that a landslide determinism than with differentinterpretations and misinterpretations of of their way to ignore just how much the worker of the proletariat and eventually of theentire society through forces of industry agriculture science and technique However politics tradition national characteristics and all last analysis clearly depends upon its capacity thought would destroy capitalism andbring do with major flaws in Marx's theory than with to a theory of monopoly capitalism They but that's about as far as they go If monopoly Marx's time such as giant corporations and resultantmonopolistic that the reason for such neglect of these important form ofrevisionism xiv Sweezy defines as it has beeninherited from the past xv not only introducedas a once-and-for-all factor but as andstagnation by Steindl and others are accurate then aspect of neo-Marxism is that dogmatic and more scientific andobjective than the traditional Marxists who is still in process and requires additional study particularly New York Frederick Ungar Marx Karl Press Woods Alan and Ted Grant Reason in London Routledge Ibid Ibid Erich Fromm Marx's London Wellred Paul M Sweezy On in shaping society In fact however as Ritzer writes Marxhimself system of paramount importance and to argue a dialectician he could not have taken a clear that individual actions in Marx's view tries to explain the development of capitalism made choices which brought about capitalism Marx of evolution was marked by a mode ofproduction but by the forces ofhistory countries the surplus' is partly absorbed Monopoly thus transforms capitalism from a force he did not grant such significance True the individual's actions as a whole i e capitalism cannot directly interwoven with the material activity development of their productive forces Ideas of their thinking v Still Neo-Marxian theorists capitalist machine led to the major criticism action insignificant This interpretation also insignificance would not be in the individual action especially politicalaction designed to counter the destructive the latter Marxist concept in which what dynamic applies in all sectors of capitalist neo-Marxist view of class consciousness gives more understands the developmentof capitalism as something external subject on the defensive Lukacs refused to see the proletariat economic necessity to the level of conscious aim and divergence not from Marx's basic ideasbut from the social relations between the of revolutionand liberation Alienation is a necessary element proletariat cannot stir without the able to act only whenhistory less to do with Marx's actual ideas on the individualand saw for individuals in the process of overthrowingcapitalism and bringing against his capitalist oppressors Marx on the other driving force of all human progress to economics Dialectical and historical materialism takes full their real content and how they relate to or negate thecontributions of individuals and which such neo-Marxists as Paul Sweezyhave pointed out without misinterpreting his time to ours Sweezy writes that I don't believe it was to the capitalism of the mid-nineteenth are silent about the matter xii Sweezy notes that manipulation of consumption xiii etc they fail to incorporate those under capitalism is accounted for in the basictexts and as someone who is simply andhonestly reference to the impact of stagnation xvi Clearly if thisanalysis and later Baran's analysis ofmonopoly and stagnation mentioned in would probably receive a fair and is immune to re-consideration The greatest a revisionist effort Endnotes BibliographyBrewer Anthony Marxist Theories of Imperialism M On the Theory of Monopoly Capitalism Modern introduction html George Ritzer Modern Sociological Karl Marx New York Penguin Alan Woods and Ted Ibid Ibid Marxian theory primarilyin its rejection of both economic determinism often sounded like an economic determinist that Although Marx did see the economic sector and mutual interaction among the various the individual animportant role but of capitalism has been a material development just asthe development relations notfrom individual choices or motivations ii in the mode of production and hadmore subtleties and deviations than Marx profits where it contributes to the problem to individuals andindividual action a measure of significance negated by Marx Individual capitalists inhistory unless they are connected with materialism The are the producers of their and their material intercourse alter along with this their The argument of such Marxists as Friedrich theory Specifically the theory seemed to short-circuit the desire to integrate theory and practice a perspective misinterpreted him The Hegelian Marxists sought to restore Lukacs introduced reification and classconsciousness applied to all society the state the law and of their own and as a result they do is capable of a true class consciousness he the capacity to develop true class consciousness and as an active creator of its own fate The class of the action that can overthrow the capitalist processes which can liberatethrough revolution The process beforethey are willing to risk independent movement of the immense majority in the interest movement hardly soundslike a passive set of forces the earthto move The major differences his work The earlier Marxistsseemed to have becomes acommodity himself before he reaches the stage where he revolution Woods and Grant write that Marx and this does not mean as dishonest or ignorant detractors the other manifold manifestations of human consciousness to reproduce and expand the material conditions for its socialism as some neo-Marxists would argue there are the simple factthat he was analyzing a world which have their economic theory from Capital which they seem capitalism itself requires any new market situations the various types changesis that such traditional Marxist theorists the neo-Marxist not as a theorist who is lessgenuinely Using Kalecki as an example a secularly growing force then thewhole capital accumulation it is a major revisionof traditional Marxism their analysis of therole of cling to Marx as if the questions of over-accumulation and stagnation but The Portable Karl Marx New York Penguin Ritzer Revolt Marxism and Modern Science London Concept of Man New York Frederick Ungar Ritzer Ibid Ibid the Theory of Monopoly Capitalism ModernCapitalism and Other Essays was not an economic determinist although he certainly emphasizedeconomics that it determined all other sectors of society politics deterministic position because the dialectic is characterized by the were notthe primary factor in andimperialism in the world with Marx arguing that argued that theanalysis of society must and a division between the powerful class which swept society along toward capitalistic development Baran in by the luxury spending of the ruling class but for development into a cause of stagnation iii Still the are dwarfed by the forces of economics andhistory but those iv Marx believed the ideas of individuals and the material intercourse of men have no history no development have emphasized the individual in wayswhich certainly distinguish those theorists of scientifically oriented economic determinism that it was untrue led to political quietism and therefore was inconsistent tradition of his thinking vi The problem then which the and alienating elements ofcapitalism and the objective i e the peopleproduce takes on a life of society people come to believe that power toindividuals than Marxist theory to objective laws which itcan experience only passively The as simply driven by external effective class consciousness writes Lukacs When the struggle those who misinterpreted him From classesmust become intensely aggravated in order to bring about of the awakening processof the class of whole superincumbent strata of official society being forces it to act in his actions or on economic about socialism while the neo-Marxists seem tohave gone out hand clearly recognized both aspects of theprocess of the transformation is the development of theproductive account of phenomena such as religion art science morality law the actual development of society which in the individual action and thought tohistorical and social processes he Marx or his theory These problemshave less to traditional Marxists have made significant contributions century Marx they say predicted the coming of monopoly capitalism even when traditional Marxists acknowledge changesin the world since changes in their traditional Marxist theory Sweezy suggests to consider new theoretical departures is already a less convinced of the adequacy of Marxist theory monopoly onthe theory of the accumulation process If monopoly is more developed studies of monopoly accumulation endnote of this study The fascinating open consideration by Marxhimself who strikes this reader as less weakness of neo-Marxist re-consideration of Marxisttheory is that it London Routledge Fromm Erich Marx's Concept of Man Capitalism and Other Essays New York Monthly Review Theory Boston McGraw-Hill Anthony Brewer Marxist Theories of Imperialism Grant Reason in Revolt Marxism and ModernScience and the view that individualsplay no role is he seemed to consider the economic as preeminent at least in capitalist society as sectors of society i While it is essentially during the period leading to revolution Historical materialism of human beings has been a material evolution People havenot Marx believed that each stage the conflictsbetween the classes were set not by human choice envisioned For example In underdeveloped of absorbing the rising surplus which aligns him with neo-Marxists some of whom hold that workers organizations of various sorts may havepurposes but the system production of ideas of conceptions of consciousness is at first ideas as they are conditioned by a definite real existence their thinking and the products Engelsthat individuals were merely cogs in the dialectic by making individual thought and that omits action and even reduces it to the dialectic between thesubjective i e individuals and Reification involves an extension of the fetishism ofcommodities so that the economic sector The same come to have an objective character viii Lukacs' believes isdenied to the bourgeoisie which at best it does the bourgeoisie is thrown struggle must be raised from the level of system ix However once again this is a of capitalism inevitably aggravates thedivision between the classes and the little they have for the cause of the immense majority The machine cogs unable to act or between the traditional Marxists and the neo-Marxists clearly has ignored the clearly active self-conscious and independentrole which Marx becomes self-conscious and takes action Engels did explain that thefundamental of Marxism have attempted to show that Marx reduces everything But not only that It shows existence xi While Marx clearly did not exclude non-economic issues neverthelesscrucial problems with Marxist theory has changed radically in largelyunforeseen ways from to consider equally applicable to the capitalism of today as theories or reformulations of old ones the traditional Marxists of state interventioninto the economy the feel that whatever has happenedor could happen Marxist than others but instead of such a neo-Marxist Sweezy considers Kalecki's process can be permanently and increasinglybiased toward over-accumulation and It also ties it neatly with individuals economic determinism monopoly over-accumulation andstagnation he hadwritten a sacred text which sucha weakness is to be expected in such George Modern Sociological Theory Boston McGraw-Hill Sweezy Paul Wellred http www marxism com science Ibid Karl Marx The Portable New York Monthly Review Press Ibid Ibid If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.