MARSHALL, JOHN.   Term Paper ID:25798 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Life & career of third Chief Justice of Supreme Court.... More...

8 Pages / 1800 Words 8 sources, 17 Citations, APA Format $32.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Life & career of third Chief Justice of Supreme Court. Paper Introduction: John Marshall was the third Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, and he headed the Court during the era when the primary function of the Supreme Court was asserted, the task of settling constitutional disputes and deciding on the constitutionality of issues raised in the courts. Probably the most famous case of the Marshall court was indeed that of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which established the right of the Supreme Court to undertake the judicial review of a congressional statute, a principal that pertains to this day and that gives the Supreme Court the power to overturn statues if they are deemed unconstitutional. The personality of Marshall had much to do with his choice of career, his success, his elevation to this high position, and many of the decisions he made and that his Court made under his tenure. Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. The Supreme Court under Marshall and Taney.Arlington Heights, Illinois: Harlan Davidson. In 1797, President John Adams appointed Marshall to the AmericanMission to France, one of three ministers sent to negotiate a commercialagreement to protect U.S. John Marshall: Judicial statesman. Madison in 18 3, which established the rightof the Supreme Court to undertake the judicial review of a congressionalstatute, a principal that pertains to this day and that gives the SupremeCourt the power to overturn statues if they are deemed unconstitutional.The personality of Marshall had much to do with his choice of career, hissuccess, his elevation to this high position, and many of the decisions hemade and that his Court made under his tenure. (1981). . Hekept a firm grip on the Court, as can be seen in the fact that in his firstthree years on the court, the Court rendered 26 decision. The early Court had made policy as itdecided cases, and its decisions in this regard were those of theFederalist party, which means the Court favored property rights andnational over state power: The Court maintained national supremacy by voiding state acts in conflict with the Constitution and federal treaties . Illustrious Americans: John Marshall.Morristown, New Jersey: Silver Burdett. Washington hadbene a close friend of his father. During this same time, Marshall waspolitically active in Virginia and served in the House of Delegates, firstfrom 1782-179 , later from 1795-1796). . (1996). Presidents, senators an representatives, as well as justices, took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and they all insisted on their right to interpret the document (Newmyer, 1968, 25). In 18 , President Adams appointed him Secretaryof State, and in January, 18 1, after loosing his re-election bid toJefferson, Adams appointed Marshall Chief Justice of the United States (nota move designed to please the incoming president) (Dixon, 1997). http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/B/jmarshall/marsh.htm. Kutler, S.I. (1997). Madisonin 18 3. The dispatches Republicans (anti-Federalists) in the Houseused the affair to attack President Adams, and Thomas Jefferson attackedthe mission and defended Talleyrand. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall. When John was fourteen, ayoung Scot named James Thompson came to stay with the family and offered asmuch formal instruction as he could. This was reported to Washington in dispatcheswhere the three agents were referred to as X, Y, and Z. Cuneo, J.R. Thomas Marshall, the father, would have a greatinfluence on his son, as John Marshall would later acknowledge when hewrote, "To him I owe the solid foundations of all my own success in life"(Brown, 1968, 11). When Marshall took his new office in March, 18 1, he saw that therewere two things to be done: 1) he believed his Court had to enhance thetrend toward a stronger national government; and 2) he believed the Courtwould have to establish its own position as interpreter of the Constitutionto accomplish the first task. Loss to Americanmerchants soon reached $55 million, and public indignation was at a highpitch (Komroff, 1965, 68). In the closing days of the Washington administration, theUnited States signed John Hay's Treaty with Great Britain, negotiated forthe United States by Chief Justice John Jay, a former member of theContinental Congress. Probably the most famous case of the Marshall courtwas indeed that of Marbury v. Marshall would later describe the Virginia of his youth as anantifederalist stronghold, though he himself had a different view, as henotes in his autobiography: When I recollect the wild and enthusiastic democracy with which my political opinions of that day were tinctured, I am disposed to ascribe my devotion to the union, and to a government competent to its preservation, at least as much to casual circumstances as to judgment. New York: Julian Messner. I had grown up at a time when a love of union and resistance to the claims of Great Britain were the inseparable inmates of the same bosom (Kutler, 1972, 16-17).Marshall starts that it was when he entered civil life and became a statelegislator that he began to see the causes of many of the sufferings thentaking place. shipping. This gave him the power to accomplish his primarytask--to use the Court to fix the basic meanings of the Constitution. The matter becamepublic and caused a scandal, with a great deal of outcry over thesolicitation for a bribe. James Madison was the newsecretary of state, and he took office before Marbury's signed and sealedcommission was delivered. This decision affirmed the power of the Supreme Court todeclare laws unconstitutional. This case was seen differently on different sides of the politicalspectrum. The Republicans saw it as "simply an attempt by the judiciary tocontrol the executive branch of the government" (Cuneo, 1975, 82).Marshall took the view that "the Supreme Court must give preference to thefundamental law--the Constitution--and declare any infringement void"(Cuneo, 1975, 86). William Marbury was appointed a justice of the peace in theDistrict of Columbia late in the administration of John Adams. Marshall was in the military during the Revolutionary War and in factspend the winter of 1777-1778 at Valley forge with Washington. Marbury wasone of a group of so-called "midnight judges" attacked by the incomingpolitical administration of Thomas Jefferson. New York:McGraw-Hill. (1968). Frontierlife offered many advantages, but it did not provide for a formal educationso that home influence and parental education became all the moreimportant. References Brown, R.C. Marshall was singularlysuccessful in his effort and changed the way the Court would do businessafter his time. . The case that would begin to decide the issue was Marbury v. (1968). He also became a leader of theFederalist party in Virginia, and it as during this period when he became arival with Thomas Jefferson, who by then had fallen out with the VirginiaFederalists. John's parents taught him to read and write, and he had noformal schooling until he was in his teens. He was the clergyman for the localAnglican parish. (1972). The first step he took as to do away withthe free use of individual opinions by judges common before his tenure. However, John Marshall spent most of his formative years in a simpleand crude environment, and he grew strong from his outdoor life. Marshall's steadfast refusal to bow down to French demands for bribesto Talleyrand and others contributed to the rift between France and theUnited States. He was an aristocrat by birth and political philosophy (in an age when gentlemen still ruled) but a democrat in manner (when democracy was the coming thing) (Newmyer, 1968, 1 -21). Stites, F.N. Marshall's unadorned prose evoked the spirit of constitutional balance: a government of laws, not of men (Smith, 1996, 325). John Marshall: Definer of a nation. France showed herdispleasure with her former ally by preying on American ships on the highseas. (1975). Madison refused to deliver the commission, andMarbury then invoked the original jurisdiction of the U.S., Supreme Court,asking that a writ of mandamus be issued to Madison ordering him to deliverthe commission. Whilethere, he also met Alexander Hamilton for the first time. Marshall came to a Supreme Court that had been largely inactive inits first 12 years. Precedents for judicial review existed inlower courts, but this was the first statement of the doctrine for theSupreme Court (Stites, 1981, 81-93). The incident wasfinally settled by the Convention of 18 . However, the Court under Chief Justice Marshall heldthat Marbury was entitled to his commission and that Madison had withheldit wrongfully. The three ministers were approached inParis by three French agents who suggested a bribe of $25 , to theFrench foreign minister, Talleyrand, and a loan of $1 , , to France asa prelude to negotiations. Komroff, M. John Marshall: Defender of the Constitution.Boston: Little, Brown and Company.----------------------- 9 And the Republican view was supported by the electoral victory of 18 . During his service in the House of Delegates, he participatedin the Virginia Convention debates about the adoption of the Constitution.Patrick Henry spoke in opposition to the Constitution, and Marshall waschosen to speak in favor of a strong judiciary (Dixon, 1997). There is evidence that the family rose to a level ofcomfortable wealth in the colonies, and one proof was that John Marshallwas elected to public office by his neighbors and served as a member of theVirginia House of Burgesses. Marshall's candidacy for the SupremeCourt was not supported enthusiastically even by his own party, but hewould have a profound effect on the Court and the nation: Within ten years the Court consolidated fear-reaching judicial power and in fifteen more put the authority of Congress on a broad and permanent constitutional footing. The French seized a large number of American vessels, and thesailors were beaten and imprisoned and the ships sold. The family later moved further west andThomas served as county clerk (Brown, 1968, 11). And when state acts violating property rights were invalidated by the courts, the sanctity of property was assured and nationalism bolstered (Newmyer, 1968, 25).Still, the Court by the time of Marshall had not yet established itself asthe authoritative interpreter of the Constitution: The Republicans supported the right of the states to interpret the constitutional powers of the federal government in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799. Marshall produced a decision that would have a lastingeffect and that would communicate ever after the importance of theseparation of powers and of the exercise of proper powers by each branch ofgovernment: The decision itself is one of the great constitutional documents of American history. Congress delayed the start of the Supreme Court sessionand repealed the Judiciary Act, dismissing circuit court judges appointedunder its provisions. The former remained a model for marshall to follow until his death, while he considered the latter "a soldier and statesman of consummate ability; and in point of comprehensiveness of mind, purity of patriotism, and soundness of principles, as among the first that had ever graced the councils of any nation." As Chief Justice, Marshall would become a leading exponent of Hamiltonian principles (Brown, 1968, 17). Alexander Hamilton had stated in 1788 that "thejudiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments ofpower," and Chief Justice John Jay had expressed his fear that thissituation was probably permanent. "John Marshall." The American Revolution--an.HTML Project. There were preparations for war over the matter,and a period of undeclared naval warfare did ensue between France and theUnited States although no formal war was declared. the manner in which power was used to achieve policy goals (Newmyer, 1968, 19).Newmyer (1968) also stated that John Marshall was well-suited for the rolehe undertook in this process: Few Americans, with the possible exception of Washington, were so appealing. He says that his own county was antifederal, but he himselfwas popular so that his federal leanings were overlooked by the electorate. The reason for the originaldiplomatic overture was the problem being encountered for American shippinginterests. . Both men influenced him: The future Chief Justice always entertained the deepest respect for Washington and Hamilton. Later, John went to a school in Westmoreland County(Brown, 1968, 12-13). John Marshall. Newmyer, R.K. Not only did the Court legitimize national power but also influenced . Talleyrand. Hewon over opponents through the force of his arguments and his good humor,all developed in emulation of his heroes--Washington and hamilton--and theexample set by his father (Cuneo, 1975, 141-143). Marshall's life represents one of the great American images, thechild born in a log cabin (in this case on the Virginia frontier) who wouldrise to great prominence. However, Marshall returned to theUnited States and was enthusiastically received by most of the country.President Adams asked him to become an Associate Justice of the SupremeCourt, but Marshall refused and in 1799 ran for a seat in the House ofRepresentatives and won. After the war, Marshall had a private law practice that flourished ashe became a well-known lawyer. Smith, J.E. Marshall wrote24 of them. Dixon , R. New York:Henry Holt and Company. Of the 1,1 6 opinions rendered by the Marshall Court over a period of34 years, Marshall wrote 519. (1965). John Marshall was the third Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of theUnited States, and he headed the Court during the era when the primaryfunction of the Supreme Court was asserted, the task of settlingconstitutional disputes and deciding on the constitutionality of issuesraised in the courts. This treaty angered France because it not onlyeradicated many of the grievances then existing between Great Britain andher former colonies but also rendered meaningless certain agreements thenin existence between France and the United States. He molded the Court into his image and presented a unitedbench to the public. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.